Make room for the work around the draft
Plan drafting, review and publication dates together
A topic list becomes a calendar when each article has an owner, a drafting slot, time for technical review and a publication target. Use this editable example to agree on the workload before starting the article.
Editable calendar example — not scheduled work
Adjust the sample dates and responsibilities
The fixed starting date is 2026-10-12. It is an example, not today’s recommended schedule. Replace questions and owners, then inspect the target dates before exporting.
- Separate draft, review and publication targets
- Changed dates, questions and owners update the output
- Download CSV; no scheduled or published task is created
Adjust the sample dates and responsibilities
The fixed starting date is 2026-10-12. It is an example, not today’s recommended schedule. Replace questions and owners, then inspect the target dates before exporting.
Fixed example, editable in this browser — not your live data
A calendar with owners and review space
Drafting starts on your selected date; this example places review two days later and publication targets another two days later, one week between rows. Dates, owners and edited questions update the table and CSV. Extra rows repeat sample questions until you replace them.
Preparing the editable worksheet…
Start with the questions and pages worth working on
Select buyer tasks your team can answer and identify the current page for each task. A calendar can contain an update as well as a new article. If the needed business evidence is missing, assign the evidence task before committing a draft date.
The topical-map guide assigns questions to pages; the frequency guide discusses workload. This template adds the dated handoffs and responsible roles that those decisions still need.
Reserve review capacity before filling every drafting slot
Put a named draft owner and a responsible reviewer beside the question. The sample places review two days after drafting and the publication target two days after that. These are fixed example intervals. After export, adjust them in your own spreadsheet to match the review time your team needs.
Ask the reviewer whether they can inspect the sources and product conditions in that slot. If not, move the start date, reduce the number of rows or change the assignment before treating the plan as a commitment.
Use publication targets as targets
A date in this worksheet does not schedule a website action. Before publishing, the team still reviews the current article, resolves remaining issues and checks the destination. If review is unfinished, revise the calendar rather than calling the row published.
The CSV can be kept in your team’s spreadsheet. It does not sync to Blogo, create WordPress jobs or run paid drafting. Use the existing article library when you are ready to work on one question.
Update the plan from completed work
After an article is reviewed and handed to the publishing team, record what actually happened in your own tracking system. Compare planned dates with the real review effort and adjust future capacity.
Keep old work visible when planning refreshes. A dated row identifies a task and owner; it is not proof of search indexing, traffic or completed publication.
- Bring one selected question into the article library.
- Keep evidence collection separate from drafting.
- Confirm the current text before editorial handoff.
Plan the content before the dates
Source and its scope
- Google: people-first content guidance
Editorial context for useful content and actual expertise. It supplies no universal posting frequency or completion-time promise.
Questions
Does downloading the calendar schedule articles?
What happens when I change the starting date?
Are the sample review gaps recommendations for every team?
Start with one question your team can review
Open the existing library when a row is ready for writing. Calendar export uses no article credits.